tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32788823.post4949031730882568304..comments2024-02-25T15:35:32.248-06:00Comments on One Eternal Day: Intelligent design is not CreationismStandfasthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18181764095358321088noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32788823.post-51974666595860418112009-05-07T20:17:00.000-05:002009-05-07T20:17:00.000-05:00I have no idea what "cdesign proponentsists" means...I have no idea what "cdesign proponentsists" means.<br /><br />Interesting quotations, but citing them is not particularly responsive to the point of Phillips' article. Regardless of what various proponents may have said, there are very significant differences between Creationism [of whatever type - see Collins at http://biologos.org/questions/biologos-id-creationism/] and ID, whatever its failings may or may not be as science.<br /><br />Thanks for the civility of the comment - some of those I received [and didn't post] tended to reinforce Phillips' argument.Standfasthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18181764095358321088noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32788823.post-88234471599695478122009-05-07T19:15:00.000-05:002009-05-07T19:15:00.000-05:00If intelligent design is not merely a re-branding ...If intelligent design is not merely a re-branding of creationism, then how do explain the provenance of the phrase "cdesign proponentsists"?<br /><br />For that matter, how do you explain any of the following:<br /><br />"Indeed, intelligent design is just the Logos theology of John's Gospel restated in the idiom of information theory." <br />- Leading IDC advocate William Dembski <br /><br />"The Intelligent Design movement starts with the recognition that "In the beginning was the Word," and "In the beginning God created." Establishing that point isn't enough, but it is absolutely essential to the rest of the gospel message." <br />- Leading IDC advocate Phillip Johnson <br /><br />"Our strategy has been to change the subject a bit so that we can get the issue of intelligent design, which really means the reality of God, before the academic world and into the schools." <br />- Leading IDC advocate Phillip JohnsonJohn the Skeptichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06328883407099469390noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32788823.post-73828571410974166522009-05-06T00:40:00.000-05:002009-05-06T00:40:00.000-05:00Travis,
No invitation necessary! Glad to have your...Travis,<br />No invitation necessary! Glad to have your comments. Greet Ginny for me.Standfasthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18181764095358321088noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32788823.post-71208704702075762072009-05-06T00:28:00.000-05:002009-05-06T00:28:00.000-05:00Sorry to pop up unannounced and uninvited, by the ...Sorry to pop up unannounced and uninvited, by the way. :) I've periodically stopped by Standfast's blog (and, less frequently, this one) since I was introduced to them by a common friend/acquaintance of ours, the inimitable Ginny B. By the way, I'm glad to see Standfast is back on the blog-wagon! :)<br /><br />-TravisAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04761853726871787460noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32788823.post-52379544917103391992009-05-06T00:18:00.000-05:002009-05-06T00:18:00.000-05:00Wow, great article! Thanks for the link. There are...Wow, great article! Thanks for the link. There are so few people in the media (or anywhere) that recognize the major differences between Creationism and ID. <br /><br />Along those lines, you may be interested in the work of Bradley Monton, an atheist philosopher professor who sees potential value in discussing ID in schools. Lots of thoughts on that at his blog... here's a relevant recent post:<br /><br />http://bradleymonton.wordpress.com/2009/04/21/positive-feedback-from-atheists/Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04761853726871787460noreply@blogger.com